Arbitrum Proposal: #0x6065f661e3f2a5673284d3d5801dfa0126218c1840215426b576effc19fcc107

[Non-Constitutional] Treasury Management v1.2

Status:
Closed
For72.6%

For: 72.6%

101,676,627 ARB

Against: 2.3%

3,167,953 ARB

Abstain: 25.1%

35,210,493 ARB

Voting Period

  -  

Proposer

0xb4c064f466931B8d0F637654c916E3F203c46f13

Description

This description has been heavily shortened due to character limits. Please refer to the forums for the full proposal. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967

ATTENTION: AFTER ~1 MONTH OF COMMUNITY FEEDBACK AND COMMITTEE MEMBER VETTING, THIS PROPOSAL HAS BEEN RENAMED FROM V1.1 TO V1.2 AFTER BEING UPDATED. PLEASE REVIEW THOROUGHLY AS OF OCTOBER 30, 2024.

Abstract

On September 12th, Entropy hosted a preliminary treasury working group call (recordings available here) in an effort to align all of the different parties within the DAO on the optimal path forward when it comes to managing the different sections of the DAO’s balance sheet. I.e., chain profits (ETH) and tokens that have been authorized for spend but have not entered circulation yet (ARB). The primary points of contention were around ARB diversification, the need for a DAO budget before the conversation on treasury management continues forward, whether the DAO needs active treasury managers at all, infrastructure selection, and details around a treasury committee’s implementation, e.g., how many individuals/entities, are they DAO-elected or appointed, when should we target to have this committee stood up, etc. From our perspective, we did gain consensus that the DAO’s profits (ETH) in the treasury should be turned productive and that a treasury management committee of some sort should be established. However, even on these two points that most people seem to be in favor of, specific details need to be ironed out for actionable strategies to be implemented.

We believe that we have come up with a fair compromise between all of the various perspectives on these identified issues, all of which stem from the information gathered during the working group calls and conversations with delegates. The compromise suggested herein will, in our opinion, enable the DAO to move forward and initiate the required operational standards for optimizing the use of idle tokens in the treasury. Based on the feedback received on the call on September 25th (link to recording here) where we presented the overarching ideas herein, we feel confident that this proposal aligns well with the treasury managers, infrastructure providers, and overall DAO sentiment towards treasury management. We are eager to gather more feedback from the community and continue iterating so this initiative can move forward.

Key Issues Treasury Management can Solve Today

  1. Service Provider Shortfalls: DAO-funded programs as well as service providers that have proved valuable to the DAO (the ARDC, Steakhouse’s services as a part of STEP, etc.) have run into the problem of having dollar-denominated contracts and not enough ARB to meet the agreed upon rate for services rendered.
  2. Flexible & Metrics-Driven Capital Deployment: The DAO is reliant on RWAs/Treasuries for passive yield on dollars, but has no mechanism for reallocating to onchain strategies as we enter a global rate cutting regime that could make onchain yields more attractive. The DAO also currently lacks the ability to frictionlessly assess the returns and underlying risks of comparative liquid market investments, how much of/when ARB in the treasury should be diversified, and how to optimize operating cash-like reserves.
  3. Reinvesting Sequencer Revenue: The DAO has neglected to do anything productive with its ETH holdings, which could provide the DAO leverage to fuel growth and partnerships alongside yield—consistent with the DAO’s growth-first mindset.

The Proposed Solution

TL;DR

Suggested Treasury Management Committee (TMC) Members:

Austin will be paid based on 20K USDC per milestone reached.

Three Sigma will be paid based on 20K USDC per milestone reached.

Make Markets will be paid based on 20K USDC per milestone reached.

Suggested Growth Management Committee (GMC) Members: